- The Athletic Entrepreneur
- Posts
- THE FULL-COURT PRESS: Everybody’s Guarding the Bag
THE FULL-COURT PRESS: Everybody’s Guarding the Bag
Ric Bucher sees revenge. We’re checking the NBA’s defense—and Enes’s shot selection.

Somebody get the referee.
Enes Kanter Freedom is pressing the WNBA like it owes him a roster spot, an apology, and back pay.
Meanwhile, Ric Bucher has pulled out the telestrator with a theory about who Freedom is really guarding.
According to Bucher’s Instagram commentary, as transcribed for this edition, Freedom’s campaign against the WNBA may be a way to strike at the NBA—the league he believes ended his career to protect its overseas business interests.
In Bucher’s reading, Freedom sees the NBA as choosing its public principles according to its financial interests. The WNBA is the pressure point.
That is a spicy scouting report.
But before we hang the championship banner, somebody check whether the ball actually went through the hoop.
THE REVENGE OFFENSE
Bucher’s theory has the ingredients of a basketball soap opera: a former player with a grievance, a powerful league, international money, and a controversy parked right under the basket.
All we need is an assistant coach whispering, “He knows too much,” before the commercial break.
The theory is plausible. It also needs evidence.
Does Bucher know this is Freedom’s strategy? Or is he watching the possession and guessing where the pass is going?
A commentator can read the floor. That does not mean he has the playbook.
You cannot turn a scouting hunch into a confirmed assist just because the delivery has playoff intensity.
BLACKBALLING: GO TO THE MONITOR
Freedom alleges that his criticism of China cost him his NBA career. The NBA has denied that allegation. Background on the dispute
That is worth investigating.
But “Freedom believes he was pushed out” and “the owners collectively agreed to blackball him” are different shots from different distances.
The second claim needs evidence of coordination.
Show the communications. Show the decision-making. Show how his activism affected those decisions.
Otherwise, we are awarding a technical foul based on somebody looking suspicious during warmups.
And the NBA’s denial is not a defensive stop by itself. “We didn’t do it” is a statement, not a highlight reel.
Put both versions on the monitor. The replay booth does not work for either bench.
WHEN THE SPREADSHEET CHECKS IN
Bucher’s broader argument is about selective conviction: loud support for some causes, quieter feet when business interests enter the lane.
That is a fair question to put to a sports league.
How much financial discomfort will an organization accept for the principles it promotes?
Everybody can dunk on an eight-foot rim. Raise the basket to “this might cost us a business partner,” and let’s see who still attacks.
The parody version practically writes itself:
“Coach, are we running the courage offense?”
“Depends. Has accounting approved the spacing?”
“Who’s taking the last shot?”
“Whoever has the smallest downside exposure.”
That is a pick-and-roll with the chief financial officer.
But the joke illustrates a concern. It does not prove what happened in this case.
THE FAN BASE DID NOT CALL THIS PLAY
Bucher also suggests that an explicit statement defining womanhood could alienate LGBTQ+ supporters and hurt the WNBA’s business.
Hold up.
Where is the audience research? The sponsor feedback? The evidence connecting that concern to a specific league decision?
You cannot assign an entire community one opinion like everybody arrived wearing matching practice jerseys.
That is not a scouting report. That is drawing five stick figures and writing “THEY ALL THINK THIS” underneath.
And a slogan about womanhood is not a complete athlete-eligibility policy.
The rulebook needs criteria. A T-shirt needs a printing company. Different jobs.
FREEDOM DOES NOT GET AN OPEN LAYUP
If we are examining the league’s incentives, Freedom gets a defender, too.
What does his campaign accomplish for women’s basketball?
Clearer rules? A workable proposal? A resolved eligibility dispute?
Or another possession with every camera following him?
Attention can be valuable. Ask anybody who has turned an argument into a content calendar.
Reuters reported that Freedom and Royce White announced intentions to enter the 2027 WNBA draft, while reports said the league considered them ineligible. Freedom said he had not received official notice. That is an eligibility dispute, not evidence that self-declaration guarantees a roster spot. Reuters reporting
If protecting athletes is the mission, show what improves for the athletes.
Calling your own number every possession is a strange way to demonstrate that you are here for the team.
THE ATHLETE BUSINESS LESSON
Bucher raises a question worth pressing: do sports organizations apply their principles consistently when money gets involved?
Run that press.
But guard the counterargument, too.
A league can have commercial incentives. A critic can have publicity incentives. A commentator can have a compelling theory. None of those observations settles the underlying facts.
For athletes building businesses, this is media literacy at game speed: separate the allegation, the interpretation, and the evidence.
Before you share the clip, ask which one you are holding.
Because the loudest person in the gym might have the microphone, the camera crew, and the dramatic entrance.
He still has to make the shot.
Credit: Ric Bucher’s @ricbucher Instagram commentary, based on the supplied transcript. The locker-room dialogue above is our satire.